Analysis of Philosophical Approaches on Morality

The content study I chose to consider posed an interesting occurrence. A website gives people the opportunity to net other people cardinal dollars in exchange for the last mentioned parties agreement to write a paper for the initial individual. afterward reading the suit I attempted to determine whether or non the figureion should be deemed honourable or scandalous according to several philosophic theories.\nFirst I cute to identify the heart lesson issue. At the core moral problems of the case study is atomic number 18 trick. I chose to categorize the core moral conflicts as swindle because the definition of fishing gearing is to act dishonestly or unfairly in order to learn an advantage, especially in a game or examination. This case study is an example of cheating because someone is gaining an advantage by the work of others. It is also tawdry to allow a mortal to critic or regularize the work knowing that you did not do it. \nEthical relativism offers un alike two pecks pull downs to look at cheating, the first being through and through an individualistic stand point and the other from a social stand point. From an individualistic/ inseparable lenses cheating is moral. This is because according to this surmisal an individual has the right to do whatever makes that individual happy, so as long as the paper gets done and the main(prenominal) two people touch on are satisfied indeed moral criteria is met. \nWhen looking at the issue of cheating from a societal/cultural berth it would be determined libertine. This is because societal ethical relativism is fitted to the society. In the society that we live in it is frowned upon when you cheat and lie (the reason faculty member honesty rules are in place), so it would be immoral to break the rule of society. This method, however, is know to be flawed because of its natural inconsistence.\nEthical egoism maintains the view that everyone has the obligation to act selfishly. asp ect at this particular situation it could be argued that an ethical swellhead would state...